GST Impact - Analysis on Textile Industry

1. Traditionally, the textile industry in India after agricultural, sector is the only industry that has generated huge employment for both, skilled and unskilled labour in textiles. The textile industry continues to be the second-largest employment generating sector in India. It offers direct employment to over 35 million people of the country.
The Indian textile industry can be categorized into Organized and unorganized sectors. The organized sector is mainly technologically driven and uses latest machineries and equipments for production of textile products. The unorganized sector, which forms a dominant part of this industry, is labour intensive. It is represented by production of clothes through weaving or spinning with the help of one's hands. The various processes involved in textile industry can be broadly classified as follows:-
ProcessOutput from the process
GinningMan-made Fiber, Cotton, Jute, Silk, Wool
ProcessingProcessed Fabric
Apparel makingGarment
The above processes were mostly exempted under the pre-GST regime. This had an adverse impact on textile industry, since it obstructed the flow of credit in the value chain. The manner of taxation of textile industry in pre-GST regime is briefly highlighted below which would better assist in understanding the GST impact on this industry.
Central Excise Duty
2. Branded Readymade garments falling under Chapters 61, 62 and 63 having a Retail Sales Price (RSP) of Rs. 1,000 and above attracted Central Excise Duty at 2% (without CENVAT) or 12.5% (with CENVAT credit). Such excise duty was attracted on 60% of RSP after allowing deduction at 40%.
Optional Central Excise exemption
2.1 In case of garments and articles, other than those mentioned above, an option was provided to the person to pay Central Excise Duty at Nil rate without availing of CENVAT credit. If the person exercised this option, he could clear the specified goods without payment of Central Excise duty. However, CENVAT credit was not allowed to him in this case.
If the manufacturer did not wish to avail of optional exemption. Central Excise duty was payable and CENVAT benefit was available to him. Garments/articles of cotton, not containing any other textile material attracted duty at 6% (with CENVAT credit) and other garments/articles attracted duty at 12.5% (with CENVAT credit).
However, majority of the persons opted for the optional exemption scheme since it was beneficial from cash flow perspective and reduced compliance burden on the manufacturer.
Service tax
3. To manufacture apparels textile industry availed various input services. However, they could not avail of the benefit of service tax paid on input services as the textile sector mainly operated under optional duty exemption as explained in above paragraphs. It added to the cost of manufacturing of the products.
Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST)
4. The levy of VAT and CST on sale of textile goods varied from State to State in India. Most of the States in India levy VAT at a lower rate on garments, usually in range of 5%-6%. Under VAT, many States also provide an option to taxpayers to opt for composition scheme in which tax is payable at concessional rate.
Entry Tax
5. Entry tax was levied on entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein. In many States, entry tax was levied on specified goods when goods entered local area. Even textiles such as cotton, woollens or silk or artificial silks were liable to entry tax in some of the States like Karnataka at the rate of 1% which added to the purchase cost.
Impact of GST
6. With the introduction of GST w.e.f. of, July 2017, above mentioned taxes have been subsumed into single tax, which has led to effective cross-utilization of credit and reduced the hassles of complying with multiple taxes. The specific impact of GST on textile industry has been highlighted below:-
6.1 Impact of GST on textile industry
Free flow of input tax credit under GST
6.1.1 In the pre-GST era, textile industry mainly operated under duty exemption mode. As explained above, benefit of CENVAT credit was not available to manufacturer availing of duty exemption which got into the cost of the product. Further, many persons operated at a small scale and were either unregistered persons or took registration under composition scheme, which again disrupted the flow of credit and led to a cascading effect.
Under GST, Government has withdrawn the optional exemption route and imposed GST on textile industry (supply of fabric attracts GST@5%, cotton fibre and yarn attract GST@5%, Synthetic yarn and Man-made fibre attract GST@18%). An attempt has been made to organize a fairly unorganized sector. If the players in the textile industry get themselves registered, it would enable flow of credit to the end-consumer and would lead to reduction in prices of the manufactured products.
Reduction in compliance burden
6.1.2 With the introduction of GST, various indirect taxes which were earlier levied (such as Central Excise, Value Added Tax/ Central Sales Tax, Octroi, Entry tax) have been subsumed. This has led to substantial reduction in compliances to be made by the manufacturer.
Under GST, such person is required to deal and comply with only GST law. Merging of various taxes under GST would also lead to reduction in cost of production of textile products.
Job workers status under GST
6.1.3 In textile industry, processing of goods through job work is a normal phenomenon, i.e., movement of goods happens to job-worker and goods move back to the sender post completion of process by the job-worker on the goods.
Under GST, any treatment or process which is applied to another person's goods is treated as supply of service. Job-worker receiving the goods for undertaking job-work is required to register under GST and discharge tax liability (provided the turnover of job-worker exceeds the threshold limit).
Considering the labour intensive nature of job-work for textile products, the GST rate on job work on textile-related items has been reduced from 18% to 5%. This would ensure that job-worker is not severely impacted due to introduction of GST.
Deferment of reverse charge provision
6.1.4 Reverse charge mechanism in respect of procurement of goods or services by registered person from unregistered suppliers has been suspended till 31 March 2018. This would imply that registered person obtaining services of weaving, spinning, etc., from unregistered persons will not be required to deposit the GST under reverse charge mechanism. However, this benefit is temporary till 31 March 2018 post which the reverse charge mechanism will be activated on such transactions.
Challenges before textile industry
7. The textile industry involves inter-dependence of organized and the unorganized sectors which will pose additional challenges to the industry.
Considering the mechanics of textile industry, many persons who cross the threshold limit may prefer to opt for composition scheme, since compliance burden on a person opting for composition scheme is relatively less than on a normal taxpayer. There will also be small weavers and other players who will not cross the threshold limit and will remain as unregistered persons under GST regime.
Under GST regime synthetic yarn and man-made fibre is taxable @ 18% whereas the output fabric is taxable at a lower rate of 5%. This would raise issue of inverted duty structure and accumulation of credit. There is a provision of claiming refund of unutilized input tax credit in case of inverted duty structure. However, in case of specified woven fabrics and knitted fabrics, the refund of unutilized input tax credit has been disallowed. This would result in accumulation of huge input tax credit and working capital blockages.
8. The introduction of GST has resulted in removal of concessions/exemptions for the textile industry which saw outrages and protests by various associations and players in the textile industry. Considering the intent of GST and peculiar manner of operation of this industry, it may take slightly longer time for the textile industry to off-set the initial hiccups of GST and grow at a competitive pace.

Bhavesh Gupta

Director - Indirect Tax Practice at IBA


Popular posts from this blog

GST Council cuts rates on 177 items; chocolates, shampoo to attract 18% tax

Consequences of incorrect invoice details uploaded while filing GSTR 1

CPI Numbers on Base 2012=100 for Rural, Urban and Combined for the Month of August 2017