CESTAT set aside demand on Mobilization advance which was not consistent with law

Gammon India Ltd Vs CST (CESTAT Mumbai) The Mumbai CESTAT, in Gammon India Ltd Vs. CST held that demand on Mobilization advance is not consistent with law and deserves to be set aside. Proviso to Section 2(31) of the CGST Act 2017 provides that deposits shall not be considered as payment made unless the supplier applies […]

from TaxGuru https://ift.tt/3kWJnDz
via gqrds

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Caution Compliance Companies continues to con Florida corporations

GST ON TOUR OPERATORS AND AIR TRAVEL AGENTS

Consequences of incorrect invoice details uploaded while filing GSTR 1