NAA directs reinvestigation as it found profiteered amount computed as incorrect

Rahul Sharma Vs Mataji Paints and Hardware (NAA) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that an un­dated application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent. The […]

from TaxGuru https://ift.tt/35h9zDI
via gqrds

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Caution Compliance Companies continues to con Florida corporations

GST ON TOUR OPERATORS AND AIR TRAVEL AGENTS

Consequences of incorrect invoice details uploaded while filing GSTR 1